- From: Sergio via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:13:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
svillar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid] What happens with grid line names when dropping tracks == The specs [mention](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#auto-repeat) that when using auto-fit, tracks with empty repetitions are dropped. My question is what happens with the grid line names defined in the repeat() function? As far as I see it we have 2 options a. we "collapse" them with other potential line names defined outside the repeat() b. we remove them as we do with tracks IMO (a) is not the right thing to do due to several reasons. First of all it seems weird to keep the line names and not the tracks. Secondly, we could lead to having only grid line names and no tracks in a definition (for example, `grid-template-rows: [a] repeat(auto-fit,[b] 10px [c]) [d];` assuming there are no items then `grid-template-rows` will become `[a b c d]` without tracks which is invalid BTW). And last but not least I really don't see any use case for that. So my proposal is that the spec explicitly mentions (b). WDYT? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/172 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 12:13:14 UTC