- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:01:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Given that, it is clear that L should be clamped to the 0 to 100 range Maybe that's right, but it isn't clear to me. Why not leave it unclampled, and leave the behavior out of 0 100 to be undefined, and see if browsers vendors come up with something useful we can later specify in a later level? Normatively clamping seems dangerous to me, as it means authors can (and therefore will) rely on the clamping to happen, and then if we ever want to do something else we're stuck. Am I missing something? (I agree with the rest of your comment) -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/289#issuecomment-231626849 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 02:01:14 UTC