W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Re-adding min() and max()?

From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:42:04 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-268748355-1482396123-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The reason for avoidance of `<` (in the past) was compatibility, not 
really syntax, as far as I remember. I don’t fancy `%` as a binary 
operator either, but it has precedent elsewhere.

The advantages of `>` over `max()` are really the same as for `+` vs. 
`sum()`, except that _plus_ is much better established externally. 
Semantically, `>` continues with the larg*er* of the adjacent terms, 
whereas `max()`selects the large*est* out of a list. I prefer the 
latter in programming languages and spreadsheet applications, but, 
unlike those, CSS has only scalars to deal with – no vectors, ranges, 
arrays or objects (except perhaps for `<<color>>` eventually). We 
don’t need more JS notation in CSS.

GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 08:42:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:06 UTC