- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 06:07:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I prefer established `width`over `thickness` and also, as in [my
comments on
#459](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/459#issuecomment-260609781),
new length units.
~~~css
@font-face {
font-family: Example; src: url(example.woff);
stroke-width: 0.05em /* base-stroke */ 0.05ex /* hair-stroke */; /*
`auto` would trust metadata */
}
.example {
font: 16px Example; font-size-adjust: 0.6 /* 1ex = 9.6px */;
text-decoration-width: 1bs; /* = 0.8px or actual stroke width or
default 1em/16 = 1px */
font-weight: 120%; /* = 1.2 × 1bs / (1em/16) – different definitions
possible */
}
~~~
--
GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/239#issuecomment-265941151
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 06:07:19 UTC