- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 06:07:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I prefer established `width`over `thickness` and also, as in [my comments on #459](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/459#issuecomment-260609781), new length units. ~~~css @font-face { font-family: Example; src: url(example.woff); stroke-width: 0.05em /* base-stroke */ 0.05ex /* hair-stroke */; /* `auto` would trust metadata */ } .example { font: 16px Example; font-size-adjust: 0.6 /* 1ex = 9.6px */; text-decoration-width: 1bs; /* = 0.8px or actual stroke width or default 1em/16 = 1px */ font-weight: 120%; /* = 1.2 × 1bs / (1em/16) – different definitions possible */ } ~~~ -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/239#issuecomment-265941151 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 06:07:19 UTC