- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:40:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The resolution was based on a discussion of the value specified in both dimensions. Fair enough, do you mind bringing it up again in a CSSWG meeting to discuss whether all values involving `stretch` and `normal` should be ratio-preserving, with the exception of `place-self: stretch stretch`? Or if we should give the author the option to control the resizing behavior: `stretch` for ratio-destroying, `normal` for ratio-preserving? I'd like to know what the groups' thoughts are explicitly for these cases. (and if the former, what alternatives you recommend to authors). Thanks. Fwiw, note that Firefox has always implemented ratio-destroying resizing for `stretch` (even when only specified in one axis) and so does Chrome. I assumed the CSSWG were aware of that in the last discussion. So I raised this issue in that context with the assumption that it should _stay_ ratio-destroying, i.e. "let's make `normal` ratio-preserving, and `stretch` _stay_ ratio-destroying". -- GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/523#issuecomment-264340229 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 00:40:09 UTC