- From: sn0281 <sn0281@uniserve.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:41:34 -0700
- To: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2026 21:48:21 UTC
On 2026-04-29 7:19 am, Adrian Gropper wrote: > Short and clear: > https://blog.spruceid.com/spruceids-comments-to-nist-on-ai-agent-identity-and-authorization/ <https://blog.spruceid.com/spruceids-comments-to-nist-on-ai-agent-identity-and-authorization/?utm_source=spruceid.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=spruceid-s-april-blog-digest&_bhlid=8f69b53470318510f63241a6f8b47a6d255f9f3a> > +1 In my opinion the 'Morrow' incident and current LLM discussions in the CCG lead to what's expressed by SpruceID's submission to NIST as the next step, i.e., that the agent identity and capability problem is going to require government decisions at large scale. The LLMs are inherently uncontrollable, unpredictable, and hence potentially dangerous now, and appear to need changes at a different level. What the CCG has already accomplished—VCs, DIDs, etc.—may be instrumental in that, as SpruceID suggests. Steven Rowat
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2026 21:48:21 UTC