- From: NIKOLAOS FOTIOY <fotiou@aueb.gr>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 22:32:19 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Huge +1 > 19 Απρ 2026, 12:11 πμ, ο χρήστης «Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>» έγραψε: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 3:29 PM Christoph <christoph@christophdorn.com> wrote: >> I did not want to just leave it hanging like that so I have generated an opinion on the perspective that I see and am moving towards in my own work. > > Christoph, I know you're an introspective person, and that's the only > reason I'm responding to this email. You have made Marcus' point so > thoroughly and convincingly that I am now re-thinking my position on > "just ignore the noise". This (LLM usage on the mailing list) is > starting to get out of hand (again). This time, the problem isn't > Morrow... it's the humans on the list that don't seem to be getting > the hint that they're overusing LLMs and subjecting the rest of us to > a tremendous amount of noise. > > Even though it is not your intention, you are harming the discourse on > this mailing list. > > Please stop. > > Melvin's response was good (as it usually is), he was terse, made his > point and got on with it. > > I can see people trying to be subtle and nice about it, but that > doesn't seem to be working. So, I am going to attempt to be polite, > but firm, because I want you to be heard by this community. > > There is a limit to what each of us will tolerate, and your email > (Christoph) shattered that limit for me (not in a good way). I'm > hoping you, Eduardo, and Michael Herman will take the rest of this > email to heart. > >> I am a fan of maximizing LLM context >> Prompt: >> Write an extensive dissertation > > I stopped reading when I hit the words "extensive dissertation". I > know you didn't realize how disrespectful of everyone else's time this > was, but let me try and spell it out: > > You generated something that would take multiple hours to read, > internalize, and analyze, and then you sent it out to a mailing list > with over 580 people on it, and you expected a subset of them to read > something that took you a fraction of that time to generate. > > This is a type of asymmetric information overloading attack that a > number of us on the mailing list have been complaining about for > weeks. > > Eduardo, your DID dashboard thing (your second pass) looks like an > improvement, but then you hit the mailing list with A LOT of > LLM-generated projects. Overwhelming the group, or at least me, to the > point where I lost all motivation to give you feedback on your > dashboard revision work (which I thought was a good improvement)... > but if you're going to keep LLM'ing me, then I don't have the time to > respond... I give up, I hope you have great success, but I can't > review every LLM-generated project that you're sending to the list. I > don't even know which one of them you care about the most. I'm > overwhelmed. You have overwhelmed me, and I am completely demotivated > from engaging with your content... and that's terrible, because I > think ONE of the things I did engage on looked like it was going in a > good direction. > > Same thing for you, Michael: > >> Web 7.0: an entire general-purpose Decentralized System Architecture platform: code, test cases, Whitepaper, design docs, 15 IETF draft specifications, spec compliant, etc. etc. in less that 2 weeks > > I have no hope of ever reviewing the vast majority of that, and I > doubt others on the mailing list do, either. So, I've just shut off. > Again, I hope you're wildly successful, but I have no way of engaging > with what your LLM is generating at scale. The human is overwhelmed > and unable to help you anymore. > > The result is that the people that read the mailing list are going to > increasingly start treating each of your posts as noise. I know that's > where I am right now. Again, I'm not trying to be rude about this... > I'm trying to be polite by letting you know how what you are doing is > affecting my perception of you. The way that each of you are engaging > with your use of LLMs breaks social norms we've had for a while in > this community, and I don't think it's having the sort of positive > effect you think it is. I'd be happy to be in the minority here, > because that means I can just mark it as noise (for me) knowing that > others are benefitting from the way you're engaging. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ >
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2026 22:32:26 UTC