- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 10:09:03 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 2025-08-31 22:43, Manu Sporny wrote: > Hey Credentials CG (and VCWG, which is bcc'd), One issue I have with the current JSON-based security-standards is that they offer limited debugability. SD-JWT takes this to an extreme: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-22.html#section-5.1-30 To counter this, I have proposed a [long-term] upgrade to Deterministically Encoded CBOR and Embedded Signatures: https://cyberphone.github.io/sd-experimental/doc/#issued-sd-cwt Anders > > The W3C VCWG is considering which specifications it should consider > standardizing next, including many of the specifications the W3C > Credentials Community Group has incubated over the last several years. > It is also attempting to gather the priorities on each work item to > ensure that we can stage the work appropriately, so the group can > focus on the highest ecosystem needs first. > > In order to gather this data, we have created a poll. For each CCG > work item, it asks what you think the priority of that work item > should be, whether your organization will implement or use the > technology, and whether or not you would be willing to be on the > Editorial team of the specification. We also ask if we missed any > specification that should be considered for standardization. > > Please take the time to provide your input on what our ecosystem > should focus on next, and in what order of priority: > > https://forms.gle/4CVa62jSWUaU7V6R8 > > -- manu >
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2025 08:09:09 UTC