- From: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:48:02 +0100
- To: public-credentials@w3.org, Samuel Rinnetmäki <samuel.rinnetmaki@findy.fi>
- CC: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4336BE40-C4AD-44A0-B4BE-56E449B06F6D@danubetech.com>
Samuel, yes option 4 should be "Very important", sorry about that. Thanks also for the other suggestions, I agree. Markus On 7 February 2025 07:33:46 CET, "Samuel Rinnetmäki" <samuel.rinnetmaki@findy.fi> wrote: >Should the label for 4 be “Very important†if 2 is "Somewhat importantâ€? >[image.png] >The instructions mention “5 stars†and “1 star†but the form doesn’t use stars as labels. The instructions could also explicitly state that if the respondent doesn't understand a criterion, they can skip it. > >The question “Are there no trademark or IP issues?†could be rewritten as a statement: “There are no trademark or IP issuesâ€. > >When you fill in the form and click on “Doneâ€, you just get the same form again. A confirmation message would be nice. > > Samuel > >From: Filip Kolarik <filip26@gmail.com> >Date: Thursday, 6. February 2025 at 16.41 >To: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> >Cc: public-credentials@w3.org <public-credentials@w3.org> >Subject: Re: DID Methods WG - Survey about selection criteria > >Hi, >thank you for preparing this. I'm not sure this is the right format >for a survey. There are over 30 criteria (I stopped counting at 30), >each rated on a 1-5 scale, and you can select 10 key criteria. This >setup tends to dilute the results. For example, should I choose the >ten criteria I value most and rate them all as "Somewhat important - >Essential" (4-5 scores), or should I only assign a perfect 5 to a few >while rating the rest 5 lowest? > >What data do you expect to get from this survey, and what's the overall goal? > >Regards, >Filip > >On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:48 PM Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> wrote: >> >> Hello W3C CCG, >> >> As a reminder, the DID Methods WG is hosted by DIF in collaboration >> between DIF, W3C CCG, Trust-over-IP, and other orgs: >> https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/ >> >> We continue to look for feedback from the community to help the DID >> Methods WG identify the selection criteria considered most impactful / >> high priority to you. >> >> We already shared a link to a short survey during the past DID Methods >> WG calls, so please only fill it out if you haven't done that before. >> >> Instructions: Select 10 criteria you care about, and rank them from most >> impactful to least impactful >> Link to the survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HLCM8RK >> >> We will share the results with everyone, and then potentially revise our >> criteria to align more with the community's preferred outcomes. >> >> If anyone has any questions, please get in touch with Jonathan Rayback, >> Matt McKinney, or myself. >> >> Markus >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 7 February 2025 09:48:10 UTC