- From: Filip Kolarik <filip26@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:38:55 +0100
- To: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
Hi, thank you for preparing this. I'm not sure this is the right format for a survey. There are over 30 criteria (I stopped counting at 30), each rated on a 1-5 scale, and you can select 10 key criteria. This setup tends to dilute the results. For example, should I choose the ten criteria I value most and rate them all as "Somewhat important - Essential" (4-5 scores), or should I only assign a perfect 5 to a few while rating the rest 5 lowest? What data do you expect to get from this survey, and what's the overall goal? Regards, Filip On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:48 PM Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> wrote: > > Hello W3C CCG, > > As a reminder, the DID Methods WG is hosted by DIF in collaboration > between DIF, W3C CCG, Trust-over-IP, and other orgs: > https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/ > > We continue to look for feedback from the community to help the DID > Methods WG identify the selection criteria considered most impactful / > high priority to you. > > We already shared a link to a short survey during the past DID Methods > WG calls, so please only fill it out if you haven't done that before. > > Instructions: Select 10 criteria you care about, and rank them from most > impactful to least impactful > Link to the survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HLCM8RK > > We will share the results with everyone, and then potentially revise our > criteria to align more with the community's preferred outcomes. > > If anyone has any questions, please get in touch with Jonathan Rayback, > Matt McKinney, or myself. > > Markus > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2025 14:39:11 UTC