- From: Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:20:54 -0700
- To: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPk0ugmw07jbP6G8PqzieMzC+ch5p=W2n+JhM-fr_e_XcHvxQw@mail.gmail.com>
This kind of seems to me like barking up an unnecessary tree, but maybe as part of making a case for this type of analysis, a point of comparison could be made against a process that is a little more tangible for a human. Instead of simply comparing the compute between the cryptographic operations for different flavors of credential verification, perhaps you could also compare to the amount of compute needed to do an everyday task like load a webpage for a news article from a local newspaper website with no ad-blocker enabled. I am not quite an expert at reading the type of chart that comes out of the profiling tools in the browser, but there's a heck of a lot of compute involved in doing the sort of operation that a user might do hundreds of times in a day. I'd expect that any of the cryptographic operations involved in operating on a credential would be a lot smaller than what's involved in loading a webpage. I tried it out real quick, and it took about 3 seconds of pretty brightly lit up CPU before the page settled down and I could start reading an article. [image: Screenshot 2023-09-08 at 2.13.26 PM.png] *Nate Otto* nate@ottonomy.net Founder, Skybridge Skills he/him/his
Attachments
- image/png attachment: Screenshot_2023-09-08_at_2.13.26_PM.png
Received on Friday, 8 September 2023 21:21:14 UTC