Is the topic really about interoperability? …or, is co-existence the central topic? There are too many different categories (ecosystems) of decentralized identifiers for simple interoperability to be a useful goal IMO.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D98269.1B91FEB0]
Michael Herman
Web 7.0
From: Joel Thorstensson <joel@3box.io>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 5:04 AM
To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Maximizing interoperability between DID methods
Hi CCG,
I've been thinking a bunch about DID interoperability recently. Took the time to captured my thoughts in an article. My primary aim here is to describe a subset of the DID specification that enables interoperability across DID methods primarily in the context of fully decentralized and trustless applications, e.g. "local-first" or "self-certifying".
I hope this can lead to a productive conversation around how we as a community can coordinate to make the applications we are building more composable!
Article:
https://stigmergic.org/posts/generative-did-maximalism/
Regards,
Joel Thorstensson
Co-founder, 3Box Labs
[3Box Labs]<https://3boxlabs.com/>
