- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 17:01:17 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1ptWtp-003m6y-B2@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+4/-2/💬51)
4 issues created:
- How should we refer to the Securing specifications? (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1105
- Rewrite Proofs (Signatures) Section (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1104
- Vocabulary normative, context isn't? (by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1103
- Single Extension Point (by David-Chadwick)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1102
18 issues received 51 new comments:
- #1103 Vocabulary normative, context isn't? (2 by decentralgabe, iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1103 [discuss]
- #1102 Single Extension Point (2 by decentralgabe, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1102 [discuss]
- #1098 Clarify what "reserved properties might be more formally defined in future versions" means (1 by David-Chadwick)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1098
- #1095 Better visualization of data model (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1095 [discuss]
- #1089 Why does the Data Model context file define a DataIntegrityProof RDS class? (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1089
- #1072 How could we deals with chain reaction revocation of VC? (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1072 [question]
- #1065 Media types do not indicate securing mechanism (1 by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1065 [ready for PR]
- #1041 Add "Relay Attacks" to security considerations (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1041 [holder-binding]
- #988 Holder-Binding: Needs Privacy & Correlation, Centralization/Lock-in Considerations (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/988 [discuss] [holder-binding]
- #984 Verifier Role Confusion (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/984 [question] [terminology]
- #973 more clarity around the `id` field in the VC data model (1 by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/973 [pending close] [conversation]
- #942 Create the new role of issuee (14 by David-Chadwick, SmithSamuelM, TallTed, agropper, awoie, wip-abramson)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/942 [discuss] [terminology]
- #902 Define "prover" in addition to "holder". (3 by OR13, awoie, decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/902 [discuss] [terminology]
- #882 Add extension mechanism to allow different methods for VP-to-VC / holder binding to next version of standard to allow verification of rightfulness of presentation (2 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/882 [ready for PR] [holder-binding]
- #870 Improve tests for Evidence (4 by David-Chadwick, OR13, awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/870 [evidence] [blocked]
- #846 Include a regex for XML Date Time in the next version of the standard. (1 by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/846 [ready for PR] [discuss]
- #821 "bound"/"binding" terminology is a significantly stronger relationship than is actually present between VCs and their Subjects *or* Holders (10 by David-Chadwick, TallTed, awoie, dlongley, jandrieu)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/821 [clarification] [holder-binding] [terminology]
- #789 Explicit reference should be added about binding the VC to the holder (4 by awoie, msporny, swcurran)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/789 [ready for PR] [holder-binding]
2 issues closed:
- Zero-knowledge packed binary data format https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/949 [question]
- more clarity around the `id` field in the VC data model https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/973 [pending close] [conversation]
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+9/-4/💬30)
9 pull requests submitted:
- Add "Getting Started" section. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1111
- Add examples v2 context and landing page (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1110
- Remove non-normative base context from specification. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1109
- Remove issue marker for reserved properties under consideration. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1108
- Clarify relationship bx securing mechanisms and media types (by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1107
- Clarify proof section (by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1106
- Add guidance on Representations of Verifiable Credentials (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1101
- Media types other than vc+ld+json (by m00sey)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1100
- Mike is now independent (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1099
10 pull requests received 30 new comments:
- #1108 Remove issue marker for reserved properties under consideration. (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1108
- #1107 Clarify relationship bx securing mechanisms and media types (1 by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1107
- #1101 Add guidance on Representations of Verifiable Credentials (4 by TallTed, jandrieu)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1101
- #1099 Mike is now independent (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1099
- #1097 Add first pass at reserved properties table (8 by OR13, awoie, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1097
- #1096 Clarify language around ZKP data format (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1096
- #1093 Remove termsOfUse from v2 context (1 by TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1093
- #1091 Remove DataIntegrityProof from v2 context (3 by OR13, decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1091
- #1087 Remove section on Disputes; no one has implemented it. (7 by David-Chadwick, TallTed, brentzundel, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1087
- #1086 Fix references to old and outdated specifications. (3 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1086
4 pull requests merged:
- Mike is now independent
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1099
- Fix references to old and outdated specifications.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1086
- Clarify language around ZKP data format
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1096
- Remove section on Disputes; no one has implemented it.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1087
* w3c/vc-use-cases (+0/-0/💬3)
2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #129 Use case for Holder Binding (1 by jandrieu)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases/pull/129 [pending-close]
- #127 Non-transferable use case (2 by KDean-GS1, jandrieu)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases/pull/127
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+2/-1/💬12)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Deprecate `Ed25519Signature2020` (by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/95
- Remove myself from the editors list (by mprorock)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/94
3 pull requests received 12 new comments:
- #94 Remove myself from the editors list (2 by OR13, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/94
- #93 Added the Multikey class (7 by OR13, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/93
- #92 Remove multibase requirement from proofValue type (3 by OR13, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/92
1 pull requests merged:
- Remove myself from the editors list
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/94
* w3c/vc-jwt (+3/-2/💬4)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Adding echidna workflow (by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/79
- Mike is now independent (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/78
- Feature/editorial expansions (by mprorock)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/77
2 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #79 Adding echidna workflow (1 by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/79
- #77 Feature/editorial expansions (3 by dlongley, mprorock)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/77
2 pull requests merged:
- Mike is now independent
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/78
- Update README.md
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/75
* w3c/vc-status-list-2021 (+3/-0/💬6)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Adding the echidna workflow (by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pull/63
- fix minor Readme readability issues (by mkhraisha)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pull/62
- Fix missing close tag. (by davidlehn)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pull/61
2 pull requests received 6 new comments:
- #60 Add JSON Web Token Examples (2 by OR13, dlongley)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pull/60
- #46 Ensure that statusListCredential can be dereferenced. (4 by OR13, mkhraisha)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pull/46 [discuss] [DO NOT MERGE]
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-imp-guide
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jws-2020
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 1 May 2023 17:01:19 UTC