Re: The best DID method ever?

 Oops, the correct survey link is here
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf0An_hGKEU-2KmknWK1QJ36XEv3XWuM1cp9Km1psfwq_DhkA/viewform>
.

On Mar 13, 2023 at 2:38:50 PM, Gabe Cohen <gabe@tbd.email> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The other week I wrote a blog post (personal blog, unaffiliated with my
> employer) entitled *Toward DID:X
> <https://decentralgabe.xyz/toward-did-x/>. *In it I make a case for a new
> DID method, an evolution of the Sidetree work in DIF
> <https://identity.foundation/sidetree/spec/>, which aims to be the
> default choice for anyone looking to use a DID. Such a goal is ambitious,
> perhaps foolish, but I believe that having a DID method that is
> sufficiently decentralized (see the post for a more concrete definition)
> and exhibits a baseline of interoperability between implementations is
> vitally important for the DID-ecosystem, of which Credentials are customer
> #1.
>
> Our ecosystem needs as little fragmentation as possible, and I believe
> that a flexible system like a Sidetree V2 could just be a unifying factor
> that enhances interoperability and decentralization for all of us.
> Especially if we can chart a path that makes many existing DID methods
> compatible under the same DID-method-umbrella.
>
> I would appreciate if you could read the post and share your feedback, in
> public or private, and take the survey at the end
> <https://decentralgabe.xyz/about/>, which aims to capture interest in
> building, the feature set, where the work should take place, and what its
> goals should be.
>
> Looking forward,
>
>
> Gabe Cohen
>
> Lead Platform Engineer, Verifiable Credentials
>
> gabe@tbd.email <gcohen@tbd.email>
>
> TBD <http://tbd.website/> | LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/in/cohengabe>
> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/decentralgabe>
>
>
>