- From: Gabe Cohen <gabe@tbd.email>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:38:50 -0700
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPPN6pjEzDkN-UkJsT-i0uJ_Mp0bE1soRLaU9Ltq6Rc0qfG1tA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, The other week I wrote a blog post (personal blog, unaffiliated with my employer) entitled *Toward DID:X <https://decentralgabe.xyz/toward-did-x/>. *In it I make a case for a new DID method, an evolution of the Sidetree work in DIF <https://identity.foundation/sidetree/spec/>, which aims to be the default choice for anyone looking to use a DID. Such a goal is ambitious, perhaps foolish, but I believe that having a DID method that is sufficiently decentralized (see the post for a more concrete definition) and exhibits a baseline of interoperability between implementations is vitally important for the DID-ecosystem, of which Credentials are customer #1. Our ecosystem needs as little fragmentation as possible, and I believe that a flexible system like a Sidetree V2 could just be a unifying factor that enhances interoperability and decentralization for all of us. Especially if we can chart a path that makes many existing DID methods compatible under the same DID-method-umbrella. I would appreciate if you could read the post and share your feedback, in public or private, and take the survey at the end <https://decentralgabe.xyz/about/>, which aims to capture interest in building, the feature set, where the work should take place, and what its goals should be. Looking forward, Gabe Cohen Lead Platform Engineer, Verifiable Credentials gabe@tbd.email <gcohen@tbd.email> TBD <http://tbd.website/> | LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/in/cohengabe> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/decentralgabe>
Received on Monday, 13 March 2023 21:39:04 UTC