- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 13:29:44 -0500
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 1:21 PM Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com> wrote: > This is totally nitpicking, but it’s often better to use Fibonacci weighted ranked voting, rather than a Borda count, to magnify the difference between top competitors in a multi-voted election. The tool we're using allows us to, after the fact, re-tally ballots based on different algorithms. Here are our choices: https://www.opavote.com/methods/recommended I'm happy to recount using a different algorithm as long as the person suggesting it is willing to explain/defend why the recount method is better and then interpret the results. There are a number of algorithms that we can choose from that would require hours of reading to understand why you'd use one over the other, so we'd need someone to boil that down for us commoners. :P -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Saturday, 4 March 2023 18:30:32 UTC