See also: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1014#issuecomment-1426579997 https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#application-did-ld-json https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-w3cdidwg-media-types-with-multiple-suffixes#section-2.1 ^ Note the draft for multiple suffixes appears not adopted by an IETF WG and is also expired... Happy to assist in correcting that. OS On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:47 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > - https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#application-ld-json > - https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/json > - https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ld+json > > Interesting activity streams explicitly notes JSON compatibility: > > - https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#media-type > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7159 > > In general, JSON-LD is a JSON based syntax for RDF and the answer to your > questions is yes. > > OS > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:45 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) < > mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote: > >> Syntactically, is a typical (conformant) JSON-LD document parsable by a >> typical "plain old" JSON parser? ...e.g. NewtonSoft >> >> Michael >> > > > -- > *ORIE STEELE* > Chief Technical Officer > www.transmute.industries > > <https://www.transmute.industries> > -- *ORIE STEELE* Chief Technical Officer www.transmute.industries <https://www.transmute.industries>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 17:09:49 UTC