Re: Naive (short) question about JSON-LD parsing from Orie Steele on 2023-02-13 (public-credentials@w3.org from February 2023)

From: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:47:37 -0600
To: "Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)" <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
Cc: "public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAN8C-_K2Xv20KC4yPkB403G22UBKR76m0CX+O7GAWtg+eW4SdA@mail.gmail.com>

- https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#application-ld-json
- https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/json
- https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ld+json

Interesting activity streams explicitly notes JSON compatibility:

- https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#media-type
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7159

In general, JSON-LD is a JSON based syntax for RDF and the answer to your
questions is yes.

OS

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:45 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:

> Syntactically, is a typical (conformant) JSON-LD document parsable by a
> typical "plain old" JSON parser? ...e.g. NewtonSoft
>
> Michael
>

-- 
*ORIE STEELE*
Chief Technical Officer
www.transmute.industries

<https://www.transmute.industries>

Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 15:48:00 UTC