- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:01:39 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1oaK9L-00HGKK-GE@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+8/-0/💬32)
8 issues created:
- Add "credential boilerplates" as examples (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/935
- Define JSON Schemas for all objects in the VCDM (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/934 [discuss]
- Define a standard way to use Credential Schemas for Credential Subjects (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/933 [discuss]
- Representing Multi Issuer Credentials in the VCDM (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/932 [discuss]
- Representing Mutli Subject Credentials in the VCDM (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/931
- Representing Delegated Credentials in the VCDM (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/930 [discuss]
- Tracking Issue from TPAC: What does JSON-compatible JSON-LD mean? (by brentzundel)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/929
- Presentation hook (by philarcher)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/928
14 issues received 32 new comments:
- #934 Define JSON Schemas for all objects in the VCDM (2 by SmithSamuelM, iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/934 [discuss]
- #933 Define a standard way to use Credential Schemas for Credential Subjects (2 by darrellodonnell, decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/933 [discuss]
- #930 Representing Delegated Credentials in the VCDM (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/930 [discuss]
- #929 Tracking Issue from TPAC: What does JSON-compatible JSON-LD mean? (3 by dlongley, nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/929
- #926 Definition of evidence should align with NIST (1 by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/926
- #921 Modify the .htaccess file for https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/921
- #919 Evidence as a Related Credential (5 by OR13, decentralgabe, jandrieu, nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/919 [discuss]
- #915 Address `controller` ambiguity (1 by RieksJ)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/915
- #909 Define policies for VC Extension Registry (3 by OR13, Sakurann, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/909 [discuss]
- #908 Describe SD-JWT as an alternative for selective disclosure (6 by Sakurann, Sebastian-Elfors-IDnow, decentralgabe, nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/908
- #902 Define "prover" in addition to "holder". (4 by David-Chadwick, OR13, agropper, decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/902 [discuss]
- #893 add claims metadata (1 by Sakurann)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/893 [discuss]
- #821 "bound"/"binding" terminology is a significantly stronger relationship than is actually present between VCs and their Subjects *or* Holders (1 by RieksJ)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/821 [clarification]
- #76 Define SHACL constraints (1 by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/76
* w3c/vc-use-cases (+1/-0/💬1)
1 issues created:
- Expand on Use Cases for Multi Party Credentials (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases/issues/126
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #126 Expand on Use Cases for Multi Party Credentials (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases/issues/126
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- Schema.org namespace typos (hash should be a slash!) (by pmcb55)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/50
* w3c/vc-jwt (+13/-0/💬15)
13 issues created:
- Determine whether to include content from Verifiable Credentials Implementation Guidelines (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/28
- Respec warnings and errors (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/27
- Security Considerations section empty (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/26
- Privacy Considerations section empty (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/25
- Speculations about future JWT extensions (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/24
- Confusing text about "If no JWS is present" (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/23
- Clarify relationship between "iss" and "issuer" (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/22
- Write meaningful Introduction (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/21
- Delete "still" in description of JWT (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/18
- Write meaningful Abstract (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/17
- Adopt a more meaningful VC-JWT specification title (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/16
- Describe my core data model members are translated to JWT claims (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/15
- Various discussion points for VC-JWT Specification (by nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/14
9 issues received 15 new comments:
- #23 Confusing text about "If no JWS is present" (1 by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/23
- #18 Delete "still" in description of JWT (3 by OR13, Sakurann)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/18
- #17 Write meaningful Abstract (1 by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/17
- #16 Adopt a more meaningful VC-JWT specification title (3 by OR13, Sakurann)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/16
- #15 Describe my core data model members are translated to JWT claims (1 by TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/15
- #14 Various discussion points for VC-JWT Specification (1 by TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/14
- #13 Proposal: use did:jwk for testing dids and vc-jwt in the vc-jwt-test-suite (2 by David-Chadwick, OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/13
- #9 Represent issuance time with "iat" rather than "nbf" (1 by David-Chadwick)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/9
- #6 Support for multiple signatures (2 by David-Chadwick, TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/6 [discuss]
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+0/-1/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #927 Vocabulary synced with v2 context (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/927
1 pull requests merged:
- Vocabulary synced with v2 context
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/927
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+3/-1/💬1)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Add content to section on selective disclosure (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/53
- Add content to section on unlinkability (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/52
- Rename cryptographic hardening to cryptographic layering. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/51
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #49 Remove `suites` namespace from Multikey context url. (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/49
1 pull requests merged:
- Remove `suites` namespace from Multikey context url.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/49
* w3c/vc-jwt (+3/-0/💬0)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Initial VC-JWT Editorial Corrections (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/29
- Update spec title (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/20
- Update index.html (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/19
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-imp-guide
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jws-2020
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 19 September 2022 17:01:41 UTC