Re: DID v1.0 spec - key agreement property example

Thanks for the clarification, Markus.
I shall create an issue, sure.

Regards
Devi Prasad


On Mon, 3 Oct, 2022, 14:18 Markus Sabadello, <markus@danubetech.com> wrote:

> Devi,
>
> The "keyAgreement" term itself is defined in the default context:
> https://www.w3.org/ns/did/v1
>
> But for the specific verification method type "X25519KeyAgreementKey2019",
> I think you are correct that a context seems to be missing.
>
> It should be the 2020 context rather than the 2019 one you mention, i.e.:
> https://w3id.org/security/suites/x25519-*2020*/v1
>
> Do you maybe want to create an issue for this in the did-core repo?
>
> Markus
> On 03.10.22 10:17, devi prasad wrote:
>
> In the DID v1.0 spec, section 5.3.3 Key Agreement, example 17, I'm
> wondering if the "@context" is incomplete. Should it include the key
> agreement IRI? I looked up and found "
> https://w3id.org/security/suites/x25519-2019/v1".
>
> Please help me understand what I'm missing in my reading.
>
> Thank you!
> Devi Prasad
>
>