Re: Saying yes to making @context optional from Christopher Allen on 2022-11-29 (public-credentials@w3.org from November 2022)

From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:03:34 -0800
To: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)" <mwherman@parallelspace.net>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Nis Jespersen <nis.jespersen@gmail.com>, "dbuchner@tbd.email" <dbuchner@tbd.email>, "public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, steve capell <steve.capell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACrqygD1m6cYf3txg9m-fZEpxr=O-2diaoN64m7x52AGyDehMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 5:29 PM Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com> wrote:

> 3. Christopher's point about layer violation resonates strongly with me
> (and is probably a much more concise way to phrase my # 2)
>

I slightly updated my layer violation thoughts and posted it as an issue:

"Separation of Cryptographic Verification from Business Process (and
Semantic) Validation #986"  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/986

-- Christopher Allen

Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2022 04:05:59 UTC