- From: David Waite <dwaite@pingidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:09:57 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+3kW=bDi-sx4huNjWfee2Z=Ev9qrqxc9HydMHzL9oj6QUiO4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 9:57 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > The current OpenID approaches seem to be saying: "That problem is too > hard, so > let's just use the centralized rails that we have set up today; we can > realize > immediate benefit because of the value of VCs and DIDs WITHOUT solving the > open wallet ecosystem problem!" or "Let's just assume that you're using two > devices, because that problem is easier to solve."... which are strategies > that avoid the point of contention. > You keep saying this but I haven't really seen you address my comments to the contrary, so I'll ask more directly: Please explain what the centralized rails are for SIOP, such as the sections of the spec you have concerns about. Since you brought up CHAPI as the alternative, I'd also appreciate an explanation how the CHAPI polyfill does not meet the requirements to be called 'centralized'. -DW -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
Received on Monday, 21 March 2022 23:11:20 UTC