Re: Post Quantum and Related

+1.  Love to learn more about these topics.

Sincerely,
Harrison


On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:49 AM John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Incorporating cryptographic flexibility into any future work /
> work-in-flight looks to be really important.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Anil
>
>
>
> Anil John
>
> Technical Director, Silicon Valley Innovation Program
>
> Science and Technology Directorate
>
> US Department of Homeland Security
>
> Washington, DC, USA
>
>
>
> Email Response Time – 24 Hours
>
>
>
> [image: A picture containing graphical user interface Description
> automatically generated] <https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology>[image:
> /Users/holly.johnson/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1972159395]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 6, 2022 9:56 AM
> *To:* W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Post Quantum and Related
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact
> your component SOC with questions or concerns.
>
>
>
> All,
>
> Please do be tracking the upcoming changes around crypto primitives,
> especially signature methods.  See the recent NIST announcement for more
> details, but effectively, be planning on future support for CRYSTALS-KYBER,
> and on the signature side of things CRYSTALS-Dilithium, FALCON, and SPHINCS+
>
>
>
> NIST Announcement here:
>
>
> https://csrc.nist.gov/News/2022/pqc-candidates-to-be-standardized-and-round-4
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/csrc.nist.gov/News/2022/pqc-candidates-to-be-standardized-and-round-4__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!R9FfRGivhJPvtFVUmUDTBLcBSdEKeF4lVbAnjyi--w3CWzsRZ1dRghjhR8FzC7W3brxq$>
>
>
>
> And a pretty good game plan from CISA with some timing implications here:
>
>
> https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/current-activity/2022/07/05/prepare-new-cryptographic-standard-protect-against-future-quantum
>
>
>
> The TLDR is to assume that we need hard answers as a community, and at the
> standards level, on crypto agility by 2024, as well as support for the key
> algorithms as listed above.
>
>
>
> I would also think that any new specs being drafted should reference these
> coming changes and start to work them in.  I would also be proactive on
> adding in references as appropriate to specs you might be an editor or
> author for (or just a contributor).
>
>
>
> A draft spec that relates to the signature side of things (esp for JOSE /
> COSE) use is here (shameless plug - but do note there will be some not
> insignificant changes going into and out of IETF 114):
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-prorock-cose-post-quantum-signatures/
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-prorock-cose-post-quantum-signatures/__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!R9FfRGivhJPvtFVUmUDTBLcBSdEKeF4lVbAnjyi--w3CWzsRZ1dRghjhR8FzC9Y0NW_e$>
>
>
>
> And one that relates to underlying key storage and representation is here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uni-qsckeys/
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uni-qsckeys/__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!R9FfRGivhJPvtFVUmUDTBLcBSdEKeF4lVbAnjyi--w3CWzsRZ1dRghjhR8FzCxChwnna$>
>
>
>
> The above specs are likely a good starting place if you need to reference
> key representations and have links out to the cryptography approaches
> themselves.
>
>
>
> If the community is interested, I am happy to talk to some of the impacts
> on a main meeting, and / or bring in some of the folks that really know
> this stuff well to talk to the community about what is different and why.
> Lattices are a bit different than the cryptography that you are likely used
> to, and it is work understanding how this stuff will get deployed in
> practice, as well as to open some discussion around pros / cons of HSMs,
> potential FIPS implications, etc.
>
>
>
>
> Mike Prorock
>
> CTO, Founder
>
> https://mesur.io/
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/mesur.io/__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!R9FfRGivhJPvtFVUmUDTBLcBSdEKeF4lVbAnjyi--w3CWzsRZ1dRghjhR8FzC1MRrsys$>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2022 22:48:43 UTC