My suggestion has nothing to do with VPs ...no intended connection. There may be similarities but it's not intended. Also, to apply a "proof on top of another proof", consider using nested verifiable/structured credentials where the subject credential is nested in its entirety as a claim inside the credentialSubject of the outer credential/outer proof. Michael Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:12:43 AM To: public-credentials@w3.org <public-credentials@w3.org> Subject: Re: Future-proofing VCs via multiple signatures On 1/6/22 1:37 PM, Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) wrote: > Consider adopting the Structured Credential Envelope model Doing so would conflate VCs with VPs, wouldn't it? We are talking about a set of signatures on a VC. A set of signatures on a VP is something else entirely. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Friday, 7 January 2022 22:37:42 UTC