Re: Authorized Issuer Lists

On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 1:00 PM Tomislav Markovski <tomislav@trinsic.id> wrote:
> Would be great to get community convergence towards a more standardized solution!

Daniel, Dmitri, and Tomislav -- thank you for the interest and
pointers. I've added them to the RWoT paper here:

https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/pull/77/files#diff-fa3166507cf15e9af72e77cc609d30b51172f823e8232c703e61d70689c8cdbaR105-R114

... and expanded a (rough and inadequate) use cases and requirements
section based on the material you linked to. Feel free to PR that
paper if you have other things you feel are worth mentioning.

Given some of the other papers submitted to RWoT (holder binding,
authorized issuers,  rendering, endorsements), I'm wondering if we
need some sort of "VCs and extensions that would benefit the ecosystem
the most" session... at the risk of overloading a single group
(DIDlandia at RWoT Boston).

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Sunday, 14 August 2022 18:17:43 UTC