- From: Alan Karp <alanhkarp@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:23:03 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANpA1Z1HjDoDLn73S8eciJdvSv97rEONgzXdYFQFDzu7kZqDDA@mail.gmail.com>
I am not a "standards guy." I did serve on the UDDI (Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration) committee for a while, so I appreciate your efforts. You have both my thanks and condolences :) Because of that lack of experience with the standards process, I'm at a loss when it comes to helping. What I do know is: 1) having a specification in the first place: That's a good thing, but you've got to define the scope properly. 2) the initial structure of that specification: The outline of the spec constrains how the group considers options. I'll continue to lurk so I can pipe up when I see something that concerns me. -------------- Alan Karp On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 5:35 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 5/3/21 6:08 PM, Alan Karp wrote: > > If you aren't careful, such things can be jumbled up, leading to a > > complicated standard that serves neither community well. Adrian and I > > would like to help keep that from happening. > > Yes, acknowledged -- hearing both of you loud and clear... and I say this > as > one of the Editors of the Authorization Capabilities (zcap-ld) > specification, > which deals with many of the same delegation and authorization concerns. > Many > of us on this list do truly understand the nuances here, and that we should > tread carefully and be careful about the choices made. No one is saying > that > we should be careless here. > > That said, it has yet to be demonstrated that those concerns have anything > to > do with 1) having a specification in the first place, and/or 2) the initial > structure of that specification. > > Alan, perhaps you can help Adrian draw a direct line back to the single > concrete proposal we're attempting to make progress on... namely, can we > pick > a starting structure for the VC HTTP API specification so we can get some > of > these thoughts down? > > MikeP just asked the question of the hour: > > Mike Prorock wrote: > > Not to take away from genuine concerns here, but what does any of this > have > > to do with 1) using separate open api specification files for each > concern > > in the vc-http-api? 2) using a single respec file to document an actual > > specification for the vc-http-api? > > Alan, perhaps you can help here -- How is the discussion around > Authorization > and Delegation, which everyone wants to have (eventually), negatively > impacted > by items #1 and #2 above? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2021 17:23:27 UTC