- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:15:21 -0400
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Hi all, I have collected the following proposals for consideration by the VC HTTP API group today (these are all proposals that have been circulated on the mailing list, I'm just summarizing them here): PROPOSAL: The W3C CCG VC-HTTPI-API TF and IETF-GNAP-WG agree to joint IPR protected development of the GNAP specification. PROPOSAL: The W3C CCG VC-HTTPI-API DRAFT normatively recommends using IETF-GNAP-DRAFT. PROPOSAL: The W3C CCG VC-HTTPI-API DRAFT does not mention IETF-GNAP-DRAFT. PROPOSAL: The W3C CCG VC-HTTPI-API DRAFT informally suggests not using IETF-GNAP-DRAFT. PROPOSAL: The W3C CCG VC-HTTPI-API DRAFT normatively forbids using IETF-GNAP-DRAFT. PROPOSAL: Implementations SHOULD support authorization delegation by using technologies such as GNAP and Authorization Capabilities. PROPOSAL: Implementations MUST support authorization delegation by using technologies such as GNAP and Authorization Capabilities. PROPOSAL: Implementations MUST support OAuth2 for the /credentials/verify endpoint. Implementations MAY support other authorization mechanisms for the /credentials/verify endpoint. PROPOSAL: Implementations are informally urged to support authorization delegation. Implementations MAY support other authorization mechanisms, especially ones that support authorization delegation. We will be running these proposals today to come to some decisions wrt. the direction of the authorization aspect of the work... after we process a few PRs and issues. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2021 18:16:24 UTC