- From: Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:49:32 -0500
- To: "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "W3C Credentials CG" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Cc: "Heather Vescent" <heathervescent@gmail.com>, "Kim Hamilton" <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
Thanks Leonard, we appreciate the feedback and can make some improvements towards addressing them. Especially well received is your point about weighing substantial contributions to this mailing list fairly against simply showing up on IRC and typing “present+”. On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, at 2:38 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > I have left comments on the document (and also a similar note on the > github issue) about some significant concerns that I have...as well as > a number of inconsistencies between previous text and the revised > process text. > > Leonard > > On 1/20/21, 9:48 PM, "Wayne Chang" <wyc@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > Hello CCG membership, > > We chairs are proposing a charter amendment to address issue #136 > (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c-ccg%2Fcommunity%2Fissues%2F136&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C1504b64ec6744ec3f70008d8bdb70b4b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637467941167068896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=9PEhxyubKQ7AMb0Ylkx%2FN5KdTdTbYmqPSWccU5Xol0s%3D&reserved=0) by articulating a voting process based on Ranked Choice Voting (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fairvote.org%2Frcv&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C1504b64ec6744ec3f70008d8bdb70b4b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637467941167068896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PCJszOpKPiFFFIIaT6f0JdryebajDfxdzs6OhHEaR60%3D&reserved=0) and explicit voting qualifications based on CCG participation. There are also minor scope updates to reflect the changes we've seen across work items over the years. > > This officially begins the 2-week period for the charter amendment, > as per the current charter: > > Chairs may propose amendments to the charter by asking for a call > for principled objections to the new charter. If, after a period of two > weeks, no principled objections have been presented by a current member > of the group, the new charter is approved. > > Please consult the "Amendments to this Charter" section of the > current charter for details. > > Current charter: > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F15_7noTaKsqN-TBR7VgECpy-H-zS05rNds81GyRw95jE%2Fedit%23&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C1504b64ec6744ec3f70008d8bdb70b4b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637467941167068896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AQ4bfmT6dE64chC95R%2FLohzEifzEpOGq07oMlxFhooM%3D&reserved=0 > > Charter with proposed amendments: > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1YJ2kPg_zzR8oINq9MDf6KcAma21OJtmwAENjzzHe-iA%2Fedit%23&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C1504b64ec6744ec3f70008d8bdb70b4b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637467941167068896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=s2Qs2tcgAtgqZ0csgc3OBAjjIeHhtn7xWfr1AG9cX9Y%3D&reserved=0 > > For accessibility and convenience, I have also attached the .txt > version of these charters along with a diff output. If you have > comments or feedback, either comment in this thread and the list, or > leave your comments in the Google Docs. Please reply to this list by > February 3rd if you have a principled objection to these amendments, > otherwise they will be accepted by default. To do this, you must > explicitly state that you have a principled objection and then your > concern to the list as to avoid ambiguity. > > Best, > - Wayne > >
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2021 19:50:08 UTC