RE: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Vaccination Certificate Vocabulary

To that end, we’re forming a working group on verifiable credentials and equity. Our focus is of course population health/health equity focused, but if we can contribute anything to the conversation we’d be happy to participate.

Best regards,
Jim
_______________
[cid:image004.png@01D705E2.1A364130]
Jim St.Clair
Chief Trust Officer
jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893
Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1


From: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:19 AM
To: John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>
Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Vaccination Certificate Vocabulary

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Anil, thanks for standing on—and defending—that soapbox. Someone has to!

=Drummond

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:38 AM John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov<mailto:anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>> wrote:
Very much agree.

As an FYI, our internal rationale for why we are on this public journey in the DID/VC ecosystem has multiple components:


  *   Technical ~ Need for systems and services that are resilient, self-healing, and can operate under duress in a world where perimeter-based security is no longer enough.
  *   Business ~ Prevent development of “walled gardens” or closed technology platforms that do not support common standards for security, privacy, and data exchange.
  *   Society ~ Remove limits on the growth and availability of a competitive marketplace of diverse, interoperable solutions for government and industry to draw upon to deliver cost effective and innovative solutions that are in the public interest.

The “ … in the public interest” bit REQUIRES us to deliberately, consistently and with discipline focus on ensuring equity and access. Not saying that we get it right all the time or that we succeed every time, but we try and will keep trying.

<step-off-my-soapbox />

Best Regards,

Anil


From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com<mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>>
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:56 AM
To: John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov<mailto:anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>>; W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Vaccination Certificate Vocabulary

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your component SOC with questions or concerns.

>The use case is to ensure equity and access … Globally, and not just in the fully connected world.

And this needs to be true for *EVERYTHING* we design and build – not just this project.

Leonard

From: "John, Anil" <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov<mailto:anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>>
Date: Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 8:39 AM
To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Vaccination Certificate Vocabulary
Resent-From: <public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 8:36 AM

> More generally, what is the evidence / use case metrics for offline verifiers ?

“offline” has nuances.
Is it never online, or is it occasionally connected over sparse or unreliable networks?
I would assume (as I don’t have ready access to data that will prove/disprove this assertion) that it is more likely to be the latter and not the former.

However, to answer your actual question  -

The use case is to ensure equity and access … Globally, and not just in the fully connected world.

Best Regards,

Anil

Anil John
Technical Director, Silicon Valley Innovation Program
Science and Technology Directorate
US Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC, USA

Email Response Time – 24 Hours

[https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/svip]