W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > April 2021

Re: Revocation List 2020

From: Mahmoud Alkhraishi <mahmoud@mavennet.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:24:27 +0000
To: Juan Caballero <juan@identity.foundation>, Nikos Fotiou <fotiou@aueb.gr>, "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <YTXPR0101MB0877886E2BB1AEEF3DD2CC79CC759@YTXPR0101MB0877.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hi All,
circulating a few questions that I had sent to Manu and that should've been shared on the thread.


On 4/5/21 10:07 AM, Mahmoud Alkhraishi wrote:
> I saw your thread on the Revocation List 2020 and mentioning that people
> should move to status list 2021 and I had a couple of points:

Hey Mahmoud, these are all good questions for the mailing list... would you
mind sending them there?

> * Is there an implementation for status list 2021 similar to the rev list
> 2020? -- https://github.com/digitalbazaar/vc-revocation-list
> <https://github.com/digitalbazaar/vc-revocation-list>

No, there isn't any implementation of it yet, although any implementation
should more or less be the same save for some modified `type` values, IIRC.

Basically, it should be more or less a copy-paste of the Rev list 2020
implementation.

> * if Rev list 2020 is no longer recommended probably should mention it
> somewhere on the spec with a pointer to 2021

Yes, it should... feel free to raise a PR to do that, or I'll get around to it
the next time I'm in that spec (probably not any time soon).

> * Is the logic of the standard to publish a new list whenever new
> credentials are issued?

Yes, if by "publish a new list" you mean, Example 3:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-status-list-2021/#example-3-example-revocationlist2021-credential

> or is the general idea to "update" the list with new credentials?

Hmm, also this. The thing that doesn't change is:

The initial credential issued. For example:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-status-list-2021/#example-2-example-revocationlist2021

The thing that DOES change is the status list. For example:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-status-list-2021/#example-3-example-revocationlist2021-credential

Thanks Manu for the feedback!
________________________________
From: Juan Caballero <juan@identity.foundation>
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 7:56 AM
To: Nikos Fotiou <fotiou@aueb.gr>; public-credentials@w3.org <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Revocation List 2020


Hey Nikos:

Manu is going to be at the DIF Interoperability WG Wednesday doing an "Ask me anything" session on SL-2021 & RL-2020.  If time zones allow, I'd recommend coming and asking him to say a few words or listening to the recording?  I'll post a link back to this thread after.

https://github.com/decentralized-identity/interoperability/blob/master/agenda.md#agenda---7-apr---us-time---vc-status-list-2021

Thanks,
__juan

On 4/5/2021 1:36 PM, Nikos Fotiou wrote:

Hi,
I can't understand the propose of the "id" in the "credentialStatus"
structure
(https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-status-rl-2020/#example-1-example-revocationli
st2020status) Can somebody help me?

Thanks,
Nikos


--
________________________________

Juan Caballero, PhD.
Community & Communications, Decentralized Identity Foundation<https://identity.foundation>
Freelance<https://www.caballerojuan.com> researcher, consultant, and free thinker
Signal/whatsapp: +1 415-3101351
Berlin-based: +49 1573 5994525, CEST/UTC+2
Native: English, Español; Functional: Deutsch, Français, Português
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 14:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 7 April 2021 14:25:11 UTC