- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:43:23 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 4/6/21 4:36 PM, Juan Caballero wrote: > The running notes are here Hey Juan, I'm fairly certain that these notes are not going to pass muster for W3C IPR protection if the work were to go to a Working Group. To put it another way -- the CCG can't operate like some WGs do in DIF. Not having transcriptions or recordings are a great way to: 1. Embroil your company in anti-trust, anti- competition, or collusion litigation. 2. Expose the companies in the meeting to patents or other intellectual property issues w/o any sensible defense that it was done under an IPR regime. In short, I think your lawyers might have something to say about a bunch of competitors getting together and having a discussion about the future technological direction of an industry w/o transcribing or recording a large part of the meeting. If you would like a Jitsi room where you could transcribe and record meetings, it would be fairly easy to get one set up for the Traceability group. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2021 21:43:39 UTC