- From: Nikos Fotiou <fotiou@aueb.gr>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:10:57 +0300
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <BEA411F7-E660-44CF-9119-8754DE4B055A@aueb.gr>
I was afraid that someone will respond with that :) But we are not yet ready to work with ZCAPs :) -- Nikos Fotiou - http://pages.cs.aueb.gr/~fotiou Researcher - Mobile Multimedia Laboratory Athens University of Economics and Business https://mm.aueb.gr > On 1 Apr 2021, at 6:36 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 4/1/21 10:38 AM, Nikos Fotiou wrote: >> For a number of reasons we want to replace these JWTs with VCs, but we >> cannot find a straightforward way to include the "client" key in the VC. > > Ah, I see. > > I expect my response will be controversial, but that use case isn't a > Verifiable Credentials (VC) use case; it's an Authorization Capabilities > (ZCAP) use case. > > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/ > > Particularly, see the section on "Capabilities Are Safer": > > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/#capabilities-are-safer > > and the section on "Relationship to Verifiable Credentials": > > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/#relationship-to-vc > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 16:11:19 UTC