Re: public key in a verifiable credential

I was afraid that someone will respond with that :)  But we are not yet ready to work with ZCAPs :)

--
Nikos Fotiou - http://pages.cs.aueb.gr/~fotiou
Researcher - Mobile Multimedia Laboratory
Athens University of Economics and Business
https://mm.aueb.gr

> On 1 Apr 2021, at 6:36 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/1/21 10:38 AM, Nikos Fotiou wrote:
>> For a number of reasons we want to replace these JWTs with VCs, but we 
>> cannot find a straightforward way to include the "client" key in the VC.
> 
> Ah, I see.
> 
> I expect my response will be controversial, but that use case isn't a
> Verifiable Credentials (VC) use case; it's an Authorization Capabilities
> (ZCAP) use case.
> 
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/
> 
> Particularly, see the section on "Capabilities Are Safer":
> 
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/#capabilities-are-safer
> 
> and the section on "Relationship to Verifiable Credentials":
> 
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-ld/#relationship-to-vc
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
> https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 16:11:19 UTC