- From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:19:32 -0400
- To: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANYRo8j5KCpEhzuFLocxfOG0GsQg7FOede0P5d48KxhagcEbpg@mail.gmail.com>
This work complements efforts to focus our community on adoption issues around SSI in general. The IIW30 session https://iiw.idcommons.net/ *SSI_Adoption_Sequence_in_a_Pandemic* <https://iiw.idcommons.net/SSI_Adoption_Sequence_in_a_Pandemic> comes at this by drawing a parallel with the W3C Prescription Use Case. Please check out the doc at the top of the notes as well as the IIW discussion. The prescription use case assumes there are two identities involved: the doctor as prescriber and the patient as subject. The pharmacist is the verifier. Mapping to COVID credentials, the lab is the issuer but a doctor could also be the issuer. I was unable to open the link to your COVID credentials demo on this slide https://youtu.be/yqSr0xKcG18?t=1123 What follows may be a bad assumption on my part... The key point for both David and my framing is that the patient as subject does not need a DID. The issuer may need a DID but since their credentials are typically public the holder / presentation issue for privacy might be an unnecessary barrier to adoption. Another DID issue has to do with correlation. I agree with David that FIDO2 should be baseline and DIDs pose a privacy risk that is often unnecessary. However, in general, patient privacy benefits from a self-sovereign authorization server that represents their persona across multiple service providers. How do we avoid unwarranted correlation when "registering" the FIDO2 key (browser fingerprinting?) or the authorization server (as a pairwise DID service endpoint)? Also, as we heard in the fabulous EuroPass presentation in the Ed Credentials call on Monday, in practice the verification of the subject's credential (be it about immunity or a prescription) might often be outsourced to an intermediary by the verifier and this seems to overlap with our DID Resolution work. - Adrian On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:01 AM David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Kuppinger Cole is having a free online seminar today on the Future of > Identity Management. Registration is open to everyone. See > > https://www.kuppingercole.com/events/identity-fabrics-iam > > I have just given a talk entitled "I want COVID-19 Certificates but I > don't want a DID" which some of you might find relevant and interesting. > I have recorded it and put it on YouTube here, just in case you missed it > > https://youtu.be/yqSr0xKcG18 > > I would be very interested in anyone's critical appraisal of my talk, so > that it can be improved next time > > > Kind regards > > David > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 17:20:02 UTC