- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:00:08 +0800
- To: Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SpZcUFdXeLE92CUzRkR+Gow_epqdir3LwkAb3Rb+70uzg@mail.gmail.com>
Moses I am not an epidemiologist and I dont know one off the bat but I am an expert systems designer and my expertise is about extracting expertise from human experts, I may have access to the required expertise through knowledge bases You may need expertise of the epidiemiologist rather than the human itself then let me know maybe I can help - what are the questions you need answered? P On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:07 AM Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com> wrote: > Thank you for this input. > > FYI, I know this already, it's not a spoiler. Again, I'm trying to partner > up with a notable epidemiologist on this, who could provide solid bankable > guidance. If any of you know one, please introduce me. We'll probably have > better luck finding on via the IEEE blockchains in healthcare working group? > > Anyway, my thinking is to do two releases... the first with only simple > contact tracing and no DIDs asap, and the second with VCs, location > analysis and support for antibody testing... down the road when the > science is ready. But the key is to *plan* for forthcoming functionality > in the underlying foundational design and data structures up front. This > would make us proactive rather than reactive, like the US federal > government has been. > > FYI, Fauci recently "guessed" that immunity would be likely, maybe for 1-2 > years, but then he qualified the statement by adding that this was a > personal "hope", and we won't know for sure until the science is done. A > lot depends on how fast the virus mutates, which by the way, seems to be > mutating into something less deadly but more contagious. > > Anyway, my point is that we don't need to "wait" to plan intelligently and > base the design on science... this are the core errors in Trump's logic, he > tends to wait and he does not believe in science. And why I think the Trump > will screw up contact tracing apps just like they have with everything else. > > MM > > PS, *another idea: *it might be interesting to give VCs to CDC > intelligence officers to give them access into contact sharing databases. > These would be revocable after the pandemic is over, and could > theoretically be attenuated when delegated to support staff. > > > > > On 3/30/20 9:21 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > > spoiler alert, coronavirus antibodies for MERS last 8 to 10 years, SARS 1 > to 2 years, swine flu months, "standard flu " months. covid-19 has been > potentially false reported as having a 2 week immunity in some people. IGF > and IGM antibodies are also different time scales. The ability to increase > production of antibodies after they fall but are still known how to make > may or may not less to contagion periods. We need to wait for science. > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 12:01 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 04:38, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >> >>> On 3/27/20 11:18 PM, Moses Ma wrote: >>> > How do y’all feel about Singapore’s TraceTogether? >>> > See: >>> > >>> https://www.businessinsider.com/singapore-coronavirus-app-tracking-testing-no-shutdown-how-it-works-2020-3 >>> > Also: >>> > >>> https://www.tech.gov.sg/media/technews/tracetogether-behind-the-scenes-look-at-its-development-process >>> > >>> > How would you design a fully decentralized contact tracer? >>> >>> Or, more broadly: how would you design a privacy-protecting contact >>> tracer? This is urgently needed. >>> >>> Potential variations: 1. The app notifies you if it determines that you >>> may have been exposed to COVID-19, without saying how it made that >>> determination. 2. The app notifies healthcare officials that you may >>> have been exposed, without telling them how it made that determination. >>> >>> Ideas? >>> >>> David Booth >>> >> >> >> > -- > > *Moses Ma | Managing Partner* > > moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com | moses@ngenven.com > > v+1.415.568.1068 | skype mosesma | *linktr.ee/moses.tao* > <http://linktr.ee/moses.tao> > > FutureLab provides strategy, ideation and technology for breakthrough > innovation and third generation blockchains. > > Learn more at *www.futurelabconsulting.com* > <http://futurelabconsulting.com>. For calendar invites, please cc: > mosesma@gmail.com > > > Or whet your appetite by reading *Agile Innovation* > <http://www.amazon.com/Agile-Innovation-Revolutionary-Accelerate-Engagement/dp/B00SSRSZ9A> > | *Quantum Design Sprint* > <https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Design-Sprint-Application-Disruptive/dp/1799143864> > | my blog at *psychologytoday.com* > <http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation>. > > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT > OF THE TRANSMISSION. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, > DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY > PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN > E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THIS EMAIL SHOULD > NOT BE CONSIDERED BINDING; HARD COPY DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO CREATE > LEGALLY BINDING COMMITMENTS. FOR CALENDAR INVITES, PLEASE CC: > MOSESMA@GMAIL.COM >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: FLClogo.png
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2020 01:01:00 UTC