- From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:43:54 -0600
- To: Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm>
- Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2020 17:44:19 UTC
The other reference that ought to be studied, if this topic of holder binding is interesting, is here: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/#subject-holder-relationships On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:06 AM Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi All, > > Just wanted to share a comment from which I recently learned something > new. Daniel Hardman wrote this well-explained GH issue comment that > highlights some differences in perspective between folks from "VC circles" > vs. "ZKP circles", on the topic of the holder's relationship to the > presented VC, and risks w/conflation between the presenter vs. credential > subject. There are also references and rabbit holes linked too. > > > https://github.com/decentralized-identity/presentation-exchange/issues/24#issuecomment-648533289 > > We'd love to hear from you if you have any other perspectives on this > topic or have encountered it in your work. > > Best, > - Wayne > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2020 17:44:19 UTC