Re: Request to Migrate DID Method registry management to W3C DID WG

On 2020-06-16 2:45 pm, Manu Sporny wrote:
> The DID Method sorting code, however, has clear ROI. Being able to
> see the provisional DID Methods or the ones that have a test suite 
> or claim to be in production would be helpful. -- manu

And -- as discussed in an earlier thread -- to some it would also be 
helpful to sort the DID Methods for whether they are intended for 
public or private uses, and to have a rough description of what they 
are intended to do.

So, I'd like to ask, is this type of sorting code possible also in the 
situation you're describing?

Because I believe it would be helpful, for the wider understanding of 
what's being accomplished with DIDs, if some sort of gloss text like 
that could be included, for non-technical humans to read. And also for 
developers who are attempting to understand what's being done, and by 
who; who to approach; what can be used or re-used; and what still 
needs to be built.


Steven