W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2020

Re: Digital Bazaar corporate position on upcoming election

From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:15:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFmmOzdSD9GSgsXsA-T_7p_qesYUckcgtdF=mZEi13cpSt1M-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Again, speaking only as myself, given the problems of the electoral college
in addressing elections at scale, I'd have severe reservations about
jumping to this, and I think we would only consider this if the group
makeup changed dramatically.

But also again, chairs will have the flexibility to decide as-needed in
future elections.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>

> My 2 cents. Would it be possible to do an electoral college like election?
> Each individual in the company votes, and the one who gets the majority
> becomes the company vote.
> This does have the problem of one individual who is not part of a company
> gets the same vote as an entire company (both big and small).
> I have not been participating as much as I hoped, so I am unsure whether I
> will show up to vote.
> I hope this helps.
> -Brent
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:57 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
>> Dear W3C Credentials Community Group,
>> I'm sending this email as a representative of Digital Bazaar based on
>> our concerns related to allowing multiple individuals per company to
>> vote. As some of you know, W3C Member voting polls (a different process)
>> limit voting to one vote per company. This ensures that organizations
>> cannot pack a room with employees and skew the outcome of a vote. The
>> CCG has chosen to do individual votes, which we believe is a fitting way
>> for a community group to pick its leaders.
>> This triggered an internal ethics discussion at our company, which we
>> are sharing in the spirit of being transparent about the guidance that
>> we've given our employees.
>> The question raised in the company was whether or not we were voting on
>> our personal behalf or on behalf of the needs of our company. We
>> explored voluntarily restricting our organization to one vote, which
>> almost immediately led to concerns around vote suppression among
>> employees. We explored voluntarily restricting our organization to only
>> the people that are actively involved in the work here, which led to
>> concerns around inclusion.
>> Ultimately, we decided that the only choice aligned with the morals of
>> our corporate culture is to publicly state that Digital Bazaar (the
>> corporation) will not be participating in casting a vote in this
>> election. Our employees and contractors, however, are urged to make
>> their own decision on whether or not to vote and, if they choose to
>> vote, to do so according to their personal conscience, with no direction
>> from Digital Bazaar.
>> We are stating this on this mailing list to ensure that it is in the
>> public record. I realize that this may come across as being overly
>> concerned about a simple community vote. Nevertheless, this vote is
>> setting a precedent and we want to make sure that we are being
>> upstanding citizens in all communities in which we are involved. We also
>> recognize that other corporations in this group may not choose to do
>> this, and that is their choice.
>> On behalf of Digital Bazaar in my capacity as CEO,
>> -- manu
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2020 18:15:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 10 June 2020 18:15:25 UTC