- From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:15:01 -0700
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmmOzdSD9GSgsXsA-T_7p_qesYUckcgtdF=mZEi13cpSt1M-g@mail.gmail.com>
Again, speaking only as myself, given the problems of the electoral college in addressing elections at scale, I'd have severe reservations about jumping to this, and I think we would only consider this if the group makeup changed dramatically. But also again, chairs will have the flexibility to decide as-needed in future elections. On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > My 2 cents. Would it be possible to do an electoral college like election? > > Each individual in the company votes, and the one who gets the majority > becomes the company vote. > > This does have the problem of one individual who is not part of a company > gets the same vote as an entire company (both big and small). > > I have not been participating as much as I hoped, so I am unsure whether I > will show up to vote. > > I hope this helps. > > -Brent > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:57 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > >> Dear W3C Credentials Community Group, >> >> I'm sending this email as a representative of Digital Bazaar based on >> our concerns related to allowing multiple individuals per company to >> vote. As some of you know, W3C Member voting polls (a different process) >> limit voting to one vote per company. This ensures that organizations >> cannot pack a room with employees and skew the outcome of a vote. The >> CCG has chosen to do individual votes, which we believe is a fitting way >> for a community group to pick its leaders. >> >> This triggered an internal ethics discussion at our company, which we >> are sharing in the spirit of being transparent about the guidance that >> we've given our employees. >> >> The question raised in the company was whether or not we were voting on >> our personal behalf or on behalf of the needs of our company. We >> explored voluntarily restricting our organization to one vote, which >> almost immediately led to concerns around vote suppression among >> employees. We explored voluntarily restricting our organization to only >> the people that are actively involved in the work here, which led to >> concerns around inclusion. >> >> Ultimately, we decided that the only choice aligned with the morals of >> our corporate culture is to publicly state that Digital Bazaar (the >> corporation) will not be participating in casting a vote in this >> election. Our employees and contractors, however, are urged to make >> their own decision on whether or not to vote and, if they choose to >> vote, to do so according to their personal conscience, with no direction >> from Digital Bazaar. >> >> We are stating this on this mailing list to ensure that it is in the >> public record. I realize that this may come across as being overly >> concerned about a simple community vote. Nevertheless, this vote is >> setting a precedent and we want to make sure that we are being >> upstanding citizens in all communities in which we are involved. We also >> recognize that other corporations in this group may not choose to do >> this, and that is their choice. >> >> On behalf of Digital Bazaar in my capacity as CEO, >> >> -- manu >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2020 18:15:25 UTC