- From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:57:27 -0700
- To: Daniel Buchner <danieljb2@gmail.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 20 December 2020 19:57:52 UTC
I apologize. When you and I and your team spoke at length earlier this year, I remember some discussions about how to achieve selective disclosure by returning to the issuer. Apparently I either remembered incorrectly or read too much into them. My intent was to accurately summarize what I understood, not to mischaracterize your thinking. I have lamented being misrepresented, so I know that can be frustrating. I'm sorry. --Daniel On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:44 AM Daniel Buchner <danieljb2@gmail.com> wrote: > "MS has proposed to do it [limiting disclosure] by going back to the > Issuer" - I just want to point out that we are *not* proposing calling back > to Issuers as the solution for limited disclosure. As we've researched and > written about in depth ( > https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/identity-standards-blog/advancing-privacy-with-zero-knowledge-proof-credentials/ba-p/1441554) > we are gearing up to do this via ZKPs. I'd request that folks please try > not to state the positions of other entities without high confidence in > what that entity's positions are. > > >
Received on Sunday, 20 December 2020 19:57:52 UTC