- From: Stephen Curran <swcurran@cloudcompass.ca>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:48:29 -0800
- To: Philip Kaiser <philip.kaiser@evan.team>
- Cc: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 December 2020 16:48:53 UTC
There are several approaches that are being considered. The latest discussion has been a very promising approach that Tobias Looker and Mike Lodder have been looking into that has really nice characteristics from a business flow perspective. The last I heard about that was the approach seemed to be feasible and was being reviewed in the cryptographer community. On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:36 AM Philip Kaiser <philip.kaiser@evan.team> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Is there some sort of best practice approach to building a revocation > mechanism for VCs? Coming from AnonCreds, we are now planning on > introducing BBS+ support in our application. However, unlike AnonCreds, > BBS+ does not come with its own revocation mechanism. Thus, we were > wondering if there is a general agreed-upon approach to revocation. Any > insight would be much appreciated. > > > > Thanks and best regards > > Philip Kaiser > > > -- Stephen Curran Principal, Cloud Compass Computing, Inc. (C3I) Trustee, Vice Chair - Sovrin Foundation (sovrin.org) *Schedule a Meeting: **https://calendly.com/swcurran <https://calendly.com/swcurran>*
Received on Monday, 14 December 2020 16:48:53 UTC