- From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:39:39 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
Fortunately it does effect those who do not use linked data proofs (such as JWT/JWS) On 26/11/2019 17:08, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:56 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> Yes, we clearly have an issue with naming consistency in the spec and >> will need to go one way or the other (and there are valid arguments >> for going either way). > Oof, and I just realized that we're more or less locked in to > assertioMethod, because we just shipped the Verifiable Credentials REC. > > We can always "fix" things with a v1.1 of Verifiable Credentials, but > clearly we need to get this naming stuff locked down so we don't ship > something else that then needs to be updated later. > > -- manu >
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2019 17:39:47 UTC