W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > November 2019

Re: Proposed work item: did:key DID Method

From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:49:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CACrqygBXGcoRhkNU=a_RtfFZesppeWWs3j95u3C20cV4oWnrnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:05 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
wrote:

> So in summary, did:key, did:v1 and did:github all support these proof
> purposes today, but we really need to document them in order to encourage
> others to add support.
>

So is there an actual implementation of did:github somewhere? I had looked
for it but didn’t find it.

I’m particularly interested in adding secp256k1  Schnoor musig to it as is
a great example of a place where aggregated multiple signatures and
threshold signatures that also offer privacy properties would be quite
useful.

— Christopher Allen [via iPhone]
Received on Sunday, 24 November 2019 19:49:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:19:03 UTC