Re: [AGENDA] DID Resolution Call - Thu, 7th March 2019

Hi Michael,

The presentation and recording from 2 weeks ago are here:
https://github.com/w3c-ccg/meetings/tree/gh-pages/2019-02-21-did-resolution

Yes on today's call we will definitely go over your Use Cases issue!

Markus

On 3/7/19 3:47 PM, Michael Herman (Parallelspace) wrote:
> Markus, please change 
> HTTP Binding for DID Resolution, and how it relates to the ABNF:
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/32
> to
> DID Resolver Use Cases: `did-url` Syntax Examples (and corresponding HTTP Binding Examples) 
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/32 
> This is the current title of this issue and better reflects its focus.
>
> Also, do you have a link to your presentation from our call 2 weeks ago?
>
> Lastly, I recommend we star the call by looking at the first 2 columns of the DID Resolution use cases document (https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/32) ...it will also cover off the DID resolution and deferencing topics.
>
> Best regards,
> Michael Herman (Toronto/Calgary/Seattle)
> Independent Blockchain Developer
> Hyperonomy Business Blockchain / Parallelspace Corporation 
>
> W: http://hyperonomy.com 
> C:  +1 416 524-7702
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> 
> Sent: March 5, 2019 2:07 PM
> To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
> Subject: [AGENDA] DID Resolution Call - Thu, 7th March 2019
>
> Our next call for the DID Resolution work item will be:
>
> Thu, 7th March 2019, 9pm Vienna (CET) = 3pm US Eastern = noon US Pacific
>
> Zoom Call:
> https://zoom.us/j/7077077007
>
> Text Chat:
> http://irc.w3.org/?channels=ccg
> irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#ccg
>
> AGENDA:
>
> 1. "Resolving" vs. "Dereferencing" a "DID" / "DID Reference" / "DID URL", in light of the current ABNF discussion, e.g. see:
> https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot8-barcelona/blob/master/draft-documents/understanding-dids-in-greater-depth.md
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/pull/168
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/170
>
> 2. HTTP Binding for DID Resolution, and how it relates to the ABNF:
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/32
>
> 3. DID Resolver Architectures: Remote vs. local resolvers, thin clients, full nodes, etc.
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-resolution/#did-resolution-architectures
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/28
>
> See here for the current draft (still very empty, but with basic structure):
> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-resolution/
>
> And open issues:
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues
>
> Markus + Dmitri
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 15:08:39 UTC