- From: =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:55:21 -0700
- To: "Kevin O'Brien" <kevin@kiva.org>
- Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAjunnZP-LGyzwvfUbkvwRv5SaZuKDtHx3i2Jnpv7s9qYSvbvA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to exactly what Kevin is recommending for legally approved acceptance of verifiable credentials for KYC/AML. This could be further enhanced by having the acceptable credentials (or claims) be specified by governance frameworks <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gfIz5TT0cNp2kxGMLFXr19x1uoZsruUe_0glHst2fZ8/edit?pli=1#heading=h.qwo2saj2gotg>. After all, who better to specify a governance framework than...a government ;-) On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Kevin O'Brien <kevin@kiva.org> wrote: > Here's ours: > > https://www.kiva.org/protocol > > "Kiva, Sierra Leone and U.N. agencies announced the first implementation > of the Kiva Protocol on Sept. 27, 2018, at the U.N. General Assembly. The > Kiva Protocol will be used to create a nationwide digital identification > system designed to help the country’s 7 million citizens access the > financial services they need to improve their lives. > > Globally, 1.7 billion adults are unbanked, including 80% of the citizens > of Sierra Leone. Two of the major barriers to accessing financial services > are a lack of formal identification and a lack of verifiable credit history. > > The new Kiva Protocol is designed to address these barriers by using > distributed ledger technology to issue digital identification to all > citizens. Through the Kiva Protocol, both formal and informal financial > institutions (from banks to shopkeepers giving credit) can help contribute > to a person’s credit history." > For picture, you could credit and use the photo here of President Bio > announcing it: > https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2019/01/23/kiva-partners-with-un-and-sierra-leone-to-credit-score-the-unbanked-with-blockchain/#2f43f98460a4 > or could just use our logo. > > As for thoughts on privacy and legislation, especially around KYC/AML, one > thing I bring up a lot is a hope that eventually laws and regulations will > support financial institutions only needing to verify that the individual > can present a KYC/AML credential, but not have to actually show any of the > PII. Thus, I could go to any accredited KYC/AML verification provider I > choose, present them with the PII they need to verify, then receive a > verifiable credential indicating the check has been done/passed and meets a > certain standard. This credential would be presented to a bank when > applying with them. This would actually make things more efficient for > banks, but banks are often conservative and I believe would really need > legislation or governmental guidance pushing them in this direction to get > there. > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:37 PM Christopher Allen < > ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > >> I've been asked to run a session in Wyoming during the next legislative >> Blockchain Task Force on May 6th & 7th on the topic of possible new state >> laws & regulations around identity and privacy. As Wyoming has passed 13 >> different laws related to cryptographic technologies and blockchain in the >> last two years, there is a real opportunity to help set the legislative >> agenda not only for the Wyoming but also the United States and the rest of >> the world. >> >> I need two things: >> >> - A list of government supported decentralized identity projects >> sponsored by or intended for governments. I have a list of some Sovrin and >> Veres One projects, but am missing quite a few from other companies. In >> particular, there are a lot of companies doing KYC/AML pilots with >> governments that I don't have details on. Seeking a short >> sentence/paragraph of the project, and a picture and link I can put on a >> slide for each. >> >> >> - Any thoughts on what regulatory guidance or laws might be >> appropriate for a libertarian privacy-oriented state government? >> - What do people think of Illinois biometric laws, can Wyoming do >> better? >> - How do we limit AML regs from requiring money transmitter >> licenses from most every consumer Lightning Node, Proof-of-Stake holder, or >> small-time cryptocurrency miner, and thus forcing them to AML register all >> transfers and thus violating privacy of users? >> - How to we prevent court requests for seizure of keys and instead >> only demand transfer of digital assets, as keys protect both personal >> information and digital assets. >> - How do we persuade them to consider that personal data doesn't >> easily fall into simple definitions of property, and to be careful about >> regulating PII as property, aka #RightsNotProperty? >> - Other identity/privacy oriented thoughts? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- Christopher >> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2019 00:55:58 UTC