Markus, thanks for writing this up. I commented on the final option you present in the document because I think it's the cleanest overall solution. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:10 PM Liam R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 17:32 +0200, Markus Sabadello wrote: > > Maybe this isn't an actual problem, but for some reason it keeps > > bothering me. > > I think it’s very likely to be a real problem for VCs in some of the > use cases i heard when i was involved in the Working Group. > > There were mistakes in the original RDF spec in this area, and the > difference between a thing and a name for a thing seems to be a > perennial cause of confusion. > > > > So I thought I'd write up > > < > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gSUP9DEp7IO8jyNDsVnC-7Ed6PjbMRxl89nGYUoWoeI/ > > > > > my current understanding of those questions. > > Yes i think that’s helpful. > > Liam > > > -- > Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ > Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ > XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. > Web slave for vintage clipart http://www.fromoldbooks.org/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2019 03:47:50 UTC