Re: Use Case Examples for DID URL Parameter Formats

Is "lothor-destroyer-of-worlds" a parameter defined by the DID spec, or
is it specific to the "lothor" DID method?

Maybe we should reserve the - character for method-specific parameters
to avoid collisions.

Markus

On 4/6/19 9:44 PM, =Drummond Reed wrote:
> Ooooh. My first reaction is that I like it. Avoiding a centralized
> registry = goodness.
>
> Now tell me more about the lothor-destroyer-of-worlds parameter...;-)
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:38 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com
> <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 4/6/19 1:49 PM, =Drummond Reed wrote:
>     > *Method-specific parameter names*
>
>     One thought I had after the call was to require method-specific
>     parameter names to be prefixed with the DID Method to ensure no
>     collisions. It's a simple rule that removes the need for a centralized
>     parameter name registry. So, for example:
>
>     sov-foo
>     v1-bar
>     btcr-baz
>
>     The ones in the DID spec would not be prefixed:
>
>     service
>     path
>     lothor-destroyer-of-worlds
>     etc.
>
>     -- manu
>
>     -- 
>     Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>     Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>     blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
>     https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
>