Re: The Bounty License

I'm just curious if anyone replying, has ever run/raised money on a
Kickstarter.

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:37 AM Nik Kalyani <nik@kalyani.com> wrote:

> One of my conference speaking topics is “Introduction to Smart Contract
> Development.” As an example for the talk, I created a Smart Contract and
> simplistic dApp for Open Source projects called “Buildstarter” where a
> feature champion can “register” a feature with a funding goal, and
> community members can “fund” the feature until its funded or the time
> expires. It’s not quite the same as transitioning the overall license, but
> the entire project is here https://github.com/techbubble/buildstarter and
> I’m happy to work towards moving it to production-grade (it’s only
> conference talk grade right now).
>
> On the subject of transitioning an entire OS license, there is a fair bit
> of nuanced legal complexity to it that needs to be managed. I speak from
> experience of taking an OS project from founding to venture funded
> commercialization to acquisition. I think there might be some possibility
> of having a dual license, but transitioning the license might have too many
> gotchas.
>
> As luck would have it, there is an excellent real-world example to see how
> a license change plays out including a great community discussion for
> MongoDB: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18229452
>
> Nik
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 12:45 AM, Dennis Yurkevich <dennis@miqdigital.com>
> wrote:
>
> Apologies I missed the initial conversation, could some provide a few
> examples of items you would want to distribute in this method?
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 02:29, Matt Stone <mstone@stonecover.com
> <mstone@stonecover..com>> wrote:
>
>> As a SaaS provider, this is an interesting approach.  I could imagine
>> going to an existing customer base and saying we'd like to offer feature X
>> for $n -- if we see enough interest, we'll build it.  When "the appropriate
>> level" is met, that commitment applies to the the bounty.  The company
>> decides if they need more or less than than the total bounty to prove
>> market need and/or make a long term feature investment.  In either case,
>> they would get a head start on the capability.
>>
>> -stone
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:19 PM Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How would you like to see it work, Heather?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: heather vescent <heathervescent@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 10/17/18 3:24 PM (GMT-08:00)
>>> To: melvincarvalho@gmail.com
>>> Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "W3C Credentials CG
>>> (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: The Bounty License
>>>
>>> While I applaud this concept, it is extremely problematic, specifically
>>> in putting all the risk onto the content creator.. Maybe that is not too
>>> much of a risk for a developer building code, but it is significantly
>>> different for a film producer.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:19 PM Melvin Carvalho <
>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 23:22, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Following up with an idea on "how can we fund things in this
>>>>> ecosystem".
>>>>> The concept of bounties came up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a simple concept:
>>>>>
>>>>> Release software, documentation, and specifications under a "Bounty
>>>>> License".
>>>>>
>>>>> The license states that the content is free for non-commercial use and
>>>>> sets a bounty price to transition the license into a FOSS license.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, libvc is a Verifiable Credentials library in C++. It is
>>>>> under a bounty license of $50K, if the bounty is paid, it moves to BSD
>>>>> 3-clause license. I can imagine three companies joining in and paying
>>>>> that bounty because it reduces implementation risk for them, and they
>>>>> get the software at a fraction of the cost of developing and
>>>>> maintaining
>>>>> it themselves. The upside is that the developer is paid for their
>>>>> effort
>>>>> vs. what happens today (leeching).
>>>>>
>>>>> This is easiest for software... harder for things like documentation,
>>>>> videos, etc. Information that once it's out, it's out, is more
>>>>> difficult. So, for those items, previews are released and the full
>>>>> version is only released once the bounty is paid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bounty prices would have to be above market rates... because the
>>>>> content
>>>>> creator took on considerable risk in creating the content.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- manu
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: I know there are some things that may be better paid for up front,
>>>>> and we can still do that in parallel to the suggestion above.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> love it!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>>>>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>>>>> blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Heather Vescent <http://www.heathervescent.com/>
>>> President, The Purple Tornado, Inc
>>> Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity
>>> <https://ssiscoop.com/>
>>> Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual <http://amzn.to/2i2Jz5K>
>>>
>>> @heathervescent <https://twitter.com/heathervescent> | Film Futures
>>> <https://vimeo.com/heathervescent> | Medium
>>> <https://medium..com/@heathervescent/> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/> | Future of Security
>>> Updates <https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Heather Vescent <http://www.heathervescent.com/>
President, The Purple Tornado, Inc
Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity
<https://ssiscoop.com/>
Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual <http://amzn.to/2i2Jz5K>

@heathervescent <https://twitter.com/heathervescent> | Film Futures
<https://vimeo.com/heathervescent> | Medium
<https://medium.com/@heathervescent/> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/> | Future of Security Updates
<https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/>

Received on Thursday, 18 October 2018 15:45:32 UTC