- From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:46:22 -0500
- To: Nathan Aw <nathan.mk.aw@gmail.com>
- Cc: indy@lists.hyperledger.org, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
We can't "solve" Zooko's triangle, but we can add a layer to get all the pieces we want. I still think petnames is the right approach, but let's examine whether or not adding biometric identity closes things up. - DIDs choose globally unique and decentralized/secure, skipping human meaningful - So the thing we need to layer on appears to be human meaningful In this vein, I don't see how biometric identity closes the loop. If I want to know how to refer to you, I don't see how your DNA, which is a decentralized but not generally secure and questionably globally unique (see cases of police 3d printing fingerprints in silicone) bridges over to human meaningful. It questionably adds a bit more to those layers. Even having a record of what your eyes look like or what DNA you have doesn't help me map my idea of Nathan Aw over to which DID you have... I also don't have a mapping of my concept of you to your DNA or fingerprints. So I don't personally see that bridge crossed over in the way that eg a petnames database does so. Nathan Aw writes: > Hi Friends at Indy/w3c, > > I figured that one of the key, perhaps the key, to solving the zooko > triangle theorem/challenge/riddle is to leverage biometric > (retina+fingerprint). > > If there is some way to seamlessly onboard, associate and bind one's DID, > DID Documents and Biometric data (stored in offchain in secure enclaves, > perhaps?), the zooko triangle gordian knot can indeed be solved. > > To-Be Transaction Flow: > 1. Use Biometric to access to this market place app > 2. Fetches all the claims associated with one's biometric identity > 3. Apply jobs, makes purchases seamlessly with the proofs happening behind > the scene. > > Through this, we obviate the need for users to remember lengthy usernames/ > passwords, etc thus achieving the goals of human meaningfulness, > decentralization and security. > > Is this something that is achievable? > > Am keen to work with anyone on this. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > > Nathan Aw > https://sg.linkedin.com/in/awnathan > > https://www.hyperledger.org/community/technical-ambassador > > http://www.nasdaq.com/article/guest-post-understanding-the-limits-and-potential-of-blockchain-technology-cm874892 > > https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2017/12/05/developer-showcase-series-nathan-aw-ntt-data > > https://bitcoinmagazine.com/authors/nathan-aw/ > > https://twitter.com/Hyperledger/status/938105092644974594 > > https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2018/07/24/hyperledger-sawtooth-seth-and-truffle-101 > > https://www.hyperledger.org/persons/nathan-aw > > https://github.com/nathanawmk > > https://erc725alliance.org/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2018 21:46:46 UTC