- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 16:02:54 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com>
- Cc: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 2018-11-08 2:38 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 11/8/18 11:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >> If you mean something other than what we mean by >> "object-capabilities", by all means, *please* use a different name >> rather than dilute the meaning of "object-capabilities". > > Would you be opposed to naming a specific subset of "object-capabilities"? > > For example, the currently named OCAP-LD specification is a > certificate-based system that kinda sorta separates designation from > authority and is used almost purely in decentralized systems. It's still > part of the "object-capabilities" ecosystem. > > So, would you be opposed to something like "Decentralized Capabilities", > which are a sub set of the broader "object-capabilities" space like what > was done for "Reference Capabilities"? Which to me also suggests the possibility of OCAP-DID ? Steven Rowat
Received on Friday, 9 November 2018 00:03:36 UTC