On 11/8/18 11:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > If you mean something other than what we mean by > "object-capabilities", by all means, *please* use a different name > rather than dilute the meaning of "object-capabilities". Would you be opposed to naming a specific subset of "object-capabilities"? For example, the currently named OCAP-LD specification is a certificate-based system that kinda sorta separates designation from authority and is used almost purely in decentralized systems. It's still part of the "object-capabilities" ecosystem. So, would you be opposed to something like "Decentralized Capabilities", which are a sub set of the broader "object-capabilities" space like what was done for "Reference Capabilities"? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launchesReceived on Thursday, 8 November 2018 22:38:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:50 UTC