- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:38:26 -0500
- To: Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com>
- Cc: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 11/8/18 11:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > If you mean something other than what we mean by > "object-capabilities", by all means, *please* use a different name > rather than dilute the meaning of "object-capabilities". Would you be opposed to naming a specific subset of "object-capabilities"? For example, the currently named OCAP-LD specification is a certificate-based system that kinda sorta separates designation from authority and is used almost purely in decentralized systems. It's still part of the "object-capabilities" ecosystem. So, would you be opposed to something like "Decentralized Capabilities", which are a sub set of the broader "object-capabilities" space like what was done for "Reference Capabilities"? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 22:38:52 UTC