- From: Chris Boscolo <chris@boscolo.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:18:03 -0700
- To: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 00:18:27 UTC
During the W3C call this morning, one issue that was highlighted was whether or not a DID needs to support the ability to be revoked in order to claim compliance with the standard. This prompted a question for me. Does anyone know how many of the DID methods supported via https://uniresolver.io/ do the revocation check as part of the read/verify step? Also, in re-reading the DID spec, I notice it does not specifically mention doing this check during the Read/Verify step. Would it be worth adding some language clarifying that implementors should do this? -chrisb
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 00:18:27 UTC